· Recognition of the diversity of ways written language is used by people across social institutions, communities, and social situations;
· Recognition that student must understand both how to adopt extant literacy practices and how to adapt them to new situations and needs;
· Recognition that students must understand how literacy practices connect social institutions with each other, local contexts with national and global contexts; and,
· Recognition that how literacy practices are structures and how they provide meaning constructs social relationships among people and social groups, as well as provides social identities to individuals” ( Bloome and Ensisco 298).
I am open to James Paul Gee’s term of Social Languages. According to Gee, Social languages are “distinctive in that they are used to enact, recognize, and negotiate different situated identities and to carry out different socially situated activities”. For example, there are different cultures like hip hop that require not only a specific language but you must have a distinct demeanor to activity participate in that culture.
According to a study presented by Gee in his article, “Teenagers in new times: A new literacy studies perspective”, students from low economic backgrounds were unable to “actively recruit distinctive oral and written social languages for leaning within socioculturally recognizable and meaningful academic Discourses” because they are at a disadvantage and never taught at home. Having the ability to change ones language in different social settings is also known by Lisa Delpit as “code switch”. A way we might help poor children who are unable to actively “code switch” is possibly by considering the criteria’s mentioned above as well as teaching students the various “kinds of English”. Maybe if educators were open to and accepting of a student’s home language and given reasons and explanations as to when it is appropriate to use each language, is the child more aware of how society runs.
No comments:
Post a Comment